Friday, October 21, 2016

Twitter is Down! MASSIVE DDoS Attack

I posted updates as comments below.

* Twitter, Spotify (etc) is OFFLINE from Dyn Hit With MASSIVE DDoS Attack

Is the U.S. government involved in censuring Wikileaks?

Fully explained by Michael Trimm at YouTube -- Viewer commnents show it's all over the U.S. and Europe too.

I'm in Las Vegas, and I can't get on Twitter either -- so it's not just the East Coast. YouTube (which hosts this blog) and Facebook don't seem to be affected; odd that nothing on cable news was mentioned (MSNBC, CNN, FOx News) -- especially since they reported a new dump by Wikileaks was just released. Without Twitter, how to access?

See the links below for more...

A screen shot from a cache Google search for Wikileaks Twitter shows...

Thursday, October 20, 2016

Project Veritas and Trump's Rigged Election

Project Veritas - Donald J. Trump

* Project Veritas website:
* Project Veritas Twitter:
* Project Veritas

Hear Trump's explanation at his rally the day after the 3rd debate to hear why he won't agree to the election results until AFTER Nov. 8th.

In Wednesday’s 3rd presidential debate, Donald Trump claimed that new videos proved that the Clinton machine had hired people and paid them $1,500 to be violent, cause fights, and do bad things at Trump rallies. He was referring to videos released this week by conservative activist James O’Keefe that show pro-Clinton activists boasting of their efforts to bait Trump supporters into violent acts. Trump claimed the videos expose the violence at a March Chicago rally as a criminal act and that it was now all on tape. (See links below)

Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies

In this explosive new video from Project Veritas Action, a Democratic dirty tricks operative unwittingly provides a dark money trail to the DNC and Clinton campaign. The video documents violence at Trump rallies that is traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called birddogging. A shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations are revealed. A key Clinton operative is on camera saying, “It doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this motherfucker."

Rigging the Election - Video II: Mass Voter Fraud

In the second video of James O'Keefe's new explosive series on the DNC and Hillary Clinton campaign, Democratic party operatives tell us how to successfully commit voter fraud on a massive scale. Scott Foval, who has since been fired, admits that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years.

DNC Schemes to Bully Women at Trump Rally

Aaron Black, the deputy rapid response director for the DNC is caught on camera bragging about his involvement with the Chicago Trump protest that turned violent in March. In this video he schemes about getting men to bully women at a Trump rally, saying "That is what I'm going to do. That is the hit."

It appears YouTube colluded with the Clinton to censure a Project Veritas video.

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Trump, Clinton, Al Gore, the Media and Internet

The video embedded below contains highlights from Trump's second rally on that day (the first one is here). It includes "Women for Trump" with "Diamond and Silk" in Charlotte, NC at the PNC Music Pavilion on October 14, 2016 (Not Trump's usual talking points.) NOTE: When editing Trump's speeches, I try to only use the most interesting, rare and unique moments not seen on cable news. Sometimes it's very hard to cram a whole rally into a 15-minute video. But for much more information and details on Trump's policy positions (that he usually gives in his stump speeches), visit Rightside Broadcasting at their YouTube channel to see his full rallies:

BEWARE!!! A suspected sexual predator is campaigning with a suspected man-hater (the wife of a known sexual predator) while falsely accusing their opponent of being a sexual predator!

Al Gore - Sexual Predator

Long before there was the internet (which former vice-president Al Gore claimed he had invented), most of us wouldn't run to our local library to fact-check everything the local news programs reported. For the most part (to some extent), we mostly believed them. We trusted them. After all, it was "the news", right? So they wouldn't lie to us, right?

But now that we DO have the internet, it's so much easier to fact-check. And since that time (when the internet was invented), we've also had 24/7 cable news — so that gave us a heck of a lot of fact-checking to do! And we've learned (to our horror) that those slimy "news" people have been lying to us all along!

These days, when we're watching cable news channels (like CNN, MSNBC or Fox), we're not getting real "news" most of the time, but just "political commentary". The mainstream media (which is controlled by six large corporations called "The Big Six" and controls 90% of the information we get), operates more like propaganda machines to benefit themselves and their corporate advertisers.

And ever since Al Gore invented the internet (he-he!), he's made millions of dollars selling "climate change" while traveling around the country on a private jet. He's since been accused of sexual assault; and these days he's currently campaigning for Hillary Clinton, who also says we should worry about climate change (while selling fracking all over the world). So it's odd that she would attack Trump on climate change, but Trump says "nuclear warming" is the biggest threat to the world, not "global warming". It's ironic, since Clinton had no problem at all selling uranium to Russia.

Hillary Clinton accused Bernie Sanders's supporters of not doing their own research, but we did — on the internet. And we've learned that she's a big liar (even though many of us have already known this LONG before there was the internet).

But thanks to the internet, we can also watch all of Trump's speeches, and not just the short sound bites that Clinton's media wants us to hear on their news channels and in their newspapers.

Currently she and her media are trying to make Trump out to be a sexual predator. But thanks to the internet (that a real sexual predator, Al Gore, had invented), we've learned that it's Hillary Clinton's husband who is the REAL sexual predator (and she was his enabler), and not Donald Trump.

Maybe Trump was (or still is) a wealthy womanizing/sexist "playboy", but not the monster Clinton and her media wants us to believe. Thanks to the internet (and the website Wikileaks), we know who the real liars are now . . . and it's not Donald J. Trump. It's people like the Clintons (all of them), President Barack Obama and his wife, Attorney General Loretta Lynch (and previously Eric Holder) and the FBI director James Comey who are the REAL liars.

Elect Trump, and he will clean out this corruption that's been eating away at the insides of this great country like cancer for the past 40 or more years. Otherwise, if you vote for Clinton, you'll just be perpetuating everything George Carlin warned us about in his famous skit known as "The American Dream" — where you'd have to be asleep to believe it . . . much like the members of Clinton's cult (excluding the members of her cartel, such as the super-delegates, CEOs, lobbyists and bankers — who all profit from the corruption).

George Carlin - It's a Big Club and You Ain't In It! (The American Dream)

Wiki: The Big Six:

#Trump #WomenforTrump #Women4Trump #DiamondandSilk #Charlotte #NorthCarolina #PNCMusicPavilion #HillaryClinton #CrookedHillary #Obama #LorettaLynch #JamesComey

Friday, October 14, 2016

Trump blasts the New York Times in Greensboro NC

Currently, the Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim is the 4th richest person in the world, gives millions to the Clinton Foundation (and speaks there), and is the largest shareholder of the New York Times (the paper who wrote the "groping" story about Trump.

After leaving the State Department -- but before running for President -- on February 17, 2014 Hillary Clinton (with Secret Service protection) gave a speech to Novo Nordisk in Mexico City for $125,000. Recently Wikileaks showed that Hillary Clinton is all in for "open borders". And remember, it was Bill Clinton who sighed the NAFTA trade agreement that allowed so many American jobs go to Mexico ... and Donald Trump wants to build a wall.

* Sorry for the quality of the audio in the video below (maybe Trump got an other bum microphone), but the "content" is more important, like the size of his crowds ;)

The media has been pounding Trump 24/7 about "groping" stories, but yet, HE is the one being told to "just stick to the issues". WTF!? Then why doesn't Clinton "just stick to the issues"? She doesn't mind talking about the "groping" stories!

On October 14, 2016 at his rally in Greensboro, NC -- Trump commented on the recent allegations made against him in the New York Times about alleged "groping" incidents -- and the media's complicity in pushing a slanderous and "controversial" story.

But whenever confronted about her controversies, Hillary Clinton always says we should be talking about the real issues. But when everybody is talking about Trump's womanizing, or the possible false allegations of groping, or his private locker room banter, Clinton is perfectly happy to be NOT talking about any of the issues (aside from the usual campaign slogans that someone else writes for her.)

At the exact same time when Wikileaks released new emails exposing the corruption within the Democratic Party, the Clinton campaign, the Clinton Foundation and the corporate media --- SUDDENLY --- a few women came forward (after 10, 20 and 30 years) to make allegations that Trump had groped them.

Then the corporate media reported on those allegations every hour of the day for several days in a row (sometimes ignoring hurricanes and airplane crashes) to give this story the maximum coverage and the maximum possible exposure (as though it were REAL news, rather than cheap tabloid gossip).

And then when Trump defended himself, the media and political pundits (on both sides of the aisle) said he spends too much time on this subject and that he should pivot and move on to spend more time discussing the real issues. (even though the 24/7 media MADE this an issue!)

In contrast, the media has barely given any time at all to reporting on all the many bombshell revelations that we've learned from Wikileaks, and Clinton herself hasn't been asked by anyone in the media -- and if she were, she'd either ignore the question entirely, or deny everything, or say she doesn't remember.

At the very most, when pressured (like on her email server or vote for Iraq), Clinton might say, "I'm sorry. It was a mistake. It'll never happen again" -- but she never actually has to take any real responsibility for any of her actions -- and she never has to pay any real penalty, knowing full well that President Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI director James Comey would never prosecute her. So she just keeps on campaigning as though Wikileaks doesn't even exist.

So unlike Trump, Clinton doesn't have to spend near as much time defending herself, because (for the most part) the media gives her a free pass, while holding Trump's feet to the fire every time he sneezes.

But when Trump pushes back on any allegations, he's severely criticized. So Clinton benefits both ways: the allegations themselves (as a distraction from the Wikileaks reports), and the added distractions from Trump's defense.

This is why Trump made that very widely covered speech the day before in West Palm Beach, Florida (on 10/13/2016) when he blasted the media, President Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and FBI director James Comey -- Full speech here:

* Trump's full speech on Friday, October 14, 2016 at his rally in Greensboro, NC at the White Oak ​White Oak Amphitheater.

The 10 Richest people in the World per Forbes 

#1 Bill Gates $75 Billion (Microsoft)
#2 Amancio Ortega $67 Billion (Spain)
#3 Warren Buffett $61 Billion (Obama/Clinton supporter)
#4 Carlos Slim Helu $50 Billion (Mexico)
#5 Jeff Bezos $45 Billion (Washington Post, Amazon: anti-Trump and anti-Sanders)
#6 Mark Zuckerberg $47 Billion (Facebook)
#7 Larry Ellison $44 Billion (Oracle)
#8 Michael Bloomberg $40 Billion (former NYC mayor, Clinton supporter)
#9 Charles Koch $40 Billion (Big oil)
#9 David Koch $40 Billion (Big oil)* Hillary Clinton directed her IT people (who had no security clearance) to wipe her server clean AFTER she received a subpoena from Congress. This
is called "obstruction of justice". ANYBODY ELSE would have went to jail -- just for that alone! The FBI director (James Comey) is corrupt, just as
Trump says. What's worse, Hillary and Bill Clinton's "actions" or Trump's "words".

* MSNBC: Bill Clinton's relationship with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein

* Fox News: Flight logs show Bill Clinton flew on sex offender's jet much more than previously known

* Trump may have called some women "fat pigs, dogs, slobs and disgusting animals" (most of the time, in the context of "entertainment"); but Bill Clinton treated under-aged little girls that way (in the context of personal pleasure) -- and Hillary defended his actions while getting the rapist of a 12-year-old off the hook with only 2 months of jail time -- and laughed about him passing a polygraph test!

Thursday, October 13, 2016

My Official® Trump Endorsement!

UPDATE: October 13, 2016 -- Trump delivered a scathing speech today and took no prisoners. Obama, Attorney General Loretta Lynch, crooked Hillary Clinton, FBI director James Comey, the media, the lobbyists, the whole corrupt establishment. A MUST WATCH SPEECH! It's driving a lot of controversy and the corrupt cable news channels are treating Trump like crap (even Fox News), which only proves what Trump had said in his speech today.

As a previous Bernie Sanders supporter, I've heard that I'm now called an "After Berner for Trump". Trump's recent rallies: A took his 2-hour rallies and condensed his 1-hour speeches into the most interesting 15-minutes of sound bites and posted them on my YouTube channel

I'm no longer undecided or sitting on the fence any more. After the recent Wikileaks, I can not in good conscience support Hillary Clinton in any way -- or most any Democrat -- no matter how much I might disagree with many of the Republican policy positions. This is why this previous supporter of Bernie Sanders (me) now supports Donald Trump. In a nutshell, I don't believe in rewarding liars and cheaters.

As someone who has closely monitored the media coverage of the Democratic primary, it became very apparent to me that the Clinton campaign and media were colluding to defeat Bernie Sanders; Wikileaks only confirmed my suspicions of what the Clinton campaign and the media had inferred was a "conspiracy theory". If I had not believed this, I might have accepted Sanders' defeat and bit my tongue (and swallowed my pride) and supported Clinton ... until we all learned otherwise.

But if the Democratic primary had been a fair election, I might have supported Clinton over Trump (I just wouldn't have voted for her). At first I thought the media was only giving Trump a lot of coverage for the ratings, until we learned that the Clinton campaign had colluded with the media to get Trump elected as the GOP nominee, thinking he would be easier for Clinton to beat in the general election compared to other candidates. Had I not known this, I still might have voted for Clinton as the "lesser of two evils" (or not voted at all.)

But after learning all this, how the Clinton campaign and media colluded to destroy both Sanders and Trump, and after seeing how biased the media has been, I've decided that it is crooked Hillary and the corrupt media who are the most evil, and will now support Trump - if ONLY for that reason.

I believe in fair elections, not rigged elections. I can lose something fair and square, but I get really pissed off when something is stolen from me. I hate cheaters and tend to support the underdog when they are unfairly treated.

After watching hours and hours of LIVE streams of Trump's rallies and while carefully editing his speeches for videos to unload to my YouTube channel, I've gotten to know Trump much better than what I have previously learned through short sound bites taken out of context and shown in the mainstream media. As Trump always says, THEY REALLY ARE THAT CORRUPT!

Trump always has to say he was joking and being sarcastic because the media usually reports his remarks as racist / White Supremacist / KKK-loving / Archie Bunker bigoted / totally hateful / anti-human / Nazi-Fascist / Nationalistic / protectionist / White Aryan / Islamphobic (etc.) remarks whenever that 70-year-old man mis-speaks or tries to explain his thoughts in an old-fashioned and clumsy way. The media spews so much cattle excrement! Politics really IS a very dirty business – it’s so disgusting! (And it’s mostly all about the rich getting over on the poor...because they hate to share the wealth.)

But if you want to post a comment, the best time is around 9 a.m. after I've had my coffee, checked my email, and caught up on the latest Wikileaks that has exposed all the (worse then cancer) corruption within the Democratic party. Who gives a damn about the source, the content is much more revealing (If it was Russian hackers, it’s because Putin knows Trump wouldn’t start a nuclear war like Clinton might.)

But just so ya' know, the latest Wikileaks revelations drove me from being simply anti-Hillary to Pro-Trump (I was going to sit on the fence and not vote at all); but because we're talking about the "lesser of two evils" (because now, especially compared to Trump), I don't think Trump is evil at all. I may disagree with many of his policy positions (that he wrongfully believes in, like cutting taxes for the rich), and I may not like most of the people he surrounds himself with, but at least he's not pretending to be something that he's not – he’s authentic, like I thought Bernie Sanders USED to be --- unlike the Democrats and Clintons, who are the epitome of evil incarnated.

Not ONE single human being has ever died at Trump University (although, maybe a few well-to-do naïve people got scammed by trying to get rich). But over 500,000 innocent women, children and elderly people died as a result of George W. Bush and Hillary Clinton. She LAUGHED after Gadhafi after was brutally sodomized with a knife while being killed by the local Libyan militia. A leader with “temperament” would just be humbly satisfied by the conquest of a true enemy. Only a psychopath would laugh about it!

It’s a pity what happened to Bernie Sanders – the leader of a faux pas “political revolution” – because a true revolutionary doesn’t endorse their enemy after they’ve been conquered/vanquished -- they die for their cause. Maybe his grandchildren WERE threatened by the Clinton/Democratic machine (#bodycount); but maybe (as horrific as it might sound), if that were the case, they should have been sacrificed for the “greater cause” – for the TRUTH, for the future of millions of other people in the generations to come. Because Bernie Sanders's grandparents had died in the Holocaust, he had this cowardly and morbid obsession that Trump was another Hitler...very weird shit...when we all know it’s the bankers who control almost every aspect of our daily lives, not racists or bigots like Hitler.

I have volumes more to say on the topic, but I've taken too much of your time with my rant already, but I'll close this post with a good conscience. Most people are born with a natural sense of "right" and "wrong", but no matter how many things an honest and objective person can find wrong with Trump -- or me, or millions of other "irredeemable deplorables" (that the LGBTQ community laughed at during that Clinton fundraiser), I believe in my heart-of-hearts (and soul), that the Clintons (Hillary, Bill and Chelsea) and her minions (surrogates, those in the media and the super-delegates) are 1,000 times worse.

That's my story and I'm stickin' to it -- and I hate Country and Western music -- I like classic rock ;)

Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Clinton also Raped Haiti

"You never let a serious crisis go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel (Obama chief of staff, major of Chicago)


It's very clear what the Haiti earthquake meant to the Clintons, an opportunity to scam money. Recently after Hurricane Matthew struck, they tried to profit again. The Clintons will always profit from human suffering, whether through wars and invasions, illegal arm sales or natural disasters. They are truly evil people.

How Hillary's State Dept. gave special attention to "Friends of Bill" (FOBs) after Haiti quake - ABC News

In Haiti, a factory where big money, State Department and the Clintons meet - ABC News

State Dept admits having list of Bill Clinton’s "friends", but denies preferential treatment -

VIDEO: State Dept. admits having list of Bill Clinton's ‘friends', denies preferential treatment - YouTube

Clinton Foundation statement in response to ABC questions and a request to interview Bill Clinton on the subject of Haiti - ABC News

Statement by former president of Haitian senate on new reports of Clinton corruption in Haiti - Donald J Trump for President

Clinton Foundation head declines questions about Congressional request for all communications between foundation and State Dept - PJ Media

Clinton Foundation critics revive scrutiny of Haiti failures in hurricane Matthew aftermath - Washington Examiner

Clinton Foundation asks Haiti hurricane donations, outraged Twitter users lose it - Haiti Sentinel

After hurricane Matthew Haitians fear Clintons will ‘scam’ them again (VIDEO) - WND

With all eyes on Haiti, its diaspora in Florida could swing a close election - Huffington Post

Financial analyst Charles Ortel: Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation refuse to account, in granular and verified fashion, for any of billions of dollars raised to help Haiti - Huffington Post

VIDEO: How the Red Cross, Clinton Foundation, foreign aid amplified devastating impact of hurricane in Haiti - Atlanta Black Star

VIDEO: Bill Clinton's trade policies destroyed Haitian rice farming, now Haiti faces post-hurricane famine - Democracy Now!

ARCHIVE: How the Clintons hurt Haiti - GOP

ARCHIVE: Clintons pushed most wasteful of U.S.-funded Haiti projects - Judicial Watch

ARCHIVE: Explosive charges on the Clintons exploiting Haiti aid funds -

ARCHIVE: Dinesh D’Souza on the Clinton Foundation: How the Clinton Foundation got rich off poor Haitians - National Review

ARCHIVE: How Hillary Clinton undercut women in Haiti apparel industry, The US Embassy worked with corporate interests to keep the minimum wage low - Haiti Sentinel

VIDEO ARCHIVE: VICE documentary: The Haiti money pit, how the Clinton Foundation ripped off the country - VICE

VIDEO ARCHIVE: Andrew Schwartz: How Clinton's billionaire friends profited from the Haiti disaster relief - YouTube

ARCHIVE: Clinton e-mails point to US intervention in 2010 Haiti elections - The Center for Economic and Policy Research

ARCHIVE: The corrupt Clinton Foundation in the aftermath of a massive earthquake in India - The Daily Caller

ARCHIVE: Joint report to PNG Police Commissioner and PNG Ombudsman regarding Clinton Foundation frauds in Papua New Guinea HIV/AIDS Initiative -
Michael Smith News

Thursday, October 6, 2016

Blaming Old Angry White Men

REPORT: Wages of the Working Class Falling Behind -- "The working class in America has often been defined as white male high school graduates working at wage and salary jobs." 

Is Trump just an old angry white guy, and if so, why?

My rant...

I guess these are the old (and young) angry white men that Clinton's supporters have been bashing for voting for Trump (or Sanders) and calling them sexist, misogynists and racists.

Both Sanders and Trump want “fair” trade deals, but Clinton's people say they are “anti” trade because they are against these supposed “free” trade agreements such as TPP, TTIP and TiSA (and that they're "protectionists", as though that also makes them fascists or nationalists).

These are trade deals that Obama has been pushing for -- and deals that Clinton once pushed for, before she said she finally learned what was in TPP and changed her mind. But how can you support something 45 times and say it’s the “gold standard” of trade deals if you don’t even know what’s in it? Should Congress pass it like Obamacare, just to see what’s in it?

We already know enough about these trade deals (thanks to Wikileaks) to know TPP would be like NAFTA on steroids -- and giving corporations the power to sue sovereign governments if they pass laws that hinder any future profits. Is it only uneducated “angry old white men” who oppose trade deals that gut the middle-class?

They talk about “high school graduates” as though a lack of a better education is the one and only reason for them not being able to find better paying jobs (victim blaming) as though millions of better paying jobs are going unfilled because the work force lacks a better education. (As though we’re all trailer park trash or dumb rednecks).

Are millions of jobs going unfulfilled because of all these dumb and old angry white guys? If so, then why are so many young college-educated Americans taking jobs that don’t even require a college education, which displaces those with only a high school education, and those that dropped out of school?

Are the people who work on assembly lines in China making iPhones (or children in Vietnam making NIKE sneakers) really that much smarter than we are? And why are college-educated people from India and China coming here on H-1B visas to displace college-educated Americans? Are their colleges overseas giving their young people better educations than we are in America?

The “skills gap” or “lack of STEM skills” argument is a myth to allow more offshoring of jobs and more abuse of the guestworker visas system to keep wages depressed. But let's blame all the old angry white guys for being so damn stupid.

Someone should write an article about why only dumb old white people vote for Trump or Sanders, instead of Clinton.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

The FBI Director sure sounded like a weasel!

There's a lot of new stuff to unpack from the latest hearing on Hillary Clinton and the FBI director James Comey's testimony on 9/28/16 before the House Judiciary Committee.

FBI director James Comey'

I watched the entire hearing — 3 times — once while recording, twice while editing, and a third time while reviewing the final cut (and all in one sitting, so boy am I tired!) But now I'm thoroughly convinced that President Obama put the fix in for Clinton. There's no doubt in my mind now.

The 4 hours of testimony was edited down to two separate 1-hour clips (for you) for easier viewing, because it excludes the Democrats, who asked no questions at all regarding Clinton's email server, or about her perjury before Congress, or about the FBI's immunity deals for her staff, attorneys and IT people. They reminded me of ostriches with their heads in the sand (or like Hill-bots with their heads up their asses.)

The hearing / PART ONE  -- OR  -- OR

The hearing / PART TWO  --OR  -- OR

The hearing could not be edited down to a short 15-minute "highlights" clip of relevant sound bites (I tried), because there's just too darn much new information, of which very little (so far) has been seen on cable news. Fox News reported the most, but there was very little on CNN and MSNBC (Turner Broadcasting and Comcast), who donated to Clinton's campaign and helped influence the primary election against Bernie Sanders (who now supports Clinton because of his obsessive fear of Trump, and why I can no longer believe what Bernie says.)


Towards the end, while James Comey was being questioned by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) came to Comey's defense as though she were his private attorney! It was almost laughable!

If you have the time, and if you want to hear the Democrat's obfuscation and deflection (and heaping lots praise on James Comey), the full 4 hour video of the hearing is here at C-SPAN:

Besides not recording Clinton's FBI "interview", I also wondered why the FBI didn't put wire taps on Clinton's and her accomplices phones. And like me, you'll have many more questions after watching this hearing.

This FBI investigation, as you will see, was a sham from the start — and was probably the most rigged investigation in the history of the FBI. James Comey IS a weasel . . . a lying frigging weasel. While his people might be honest and hard-working, he is as corrupt as any establishment Democrat — unless his family was also threatened (If you ask me, those guys sitting directly behind him at the hearing could have been Clinton hitmen.)

Later in the day, Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Fox and Friends that he believes that once Obama saw Trump leading in the polls during the GOP primary, he put out the word that no one would be prosecuted because he did not want Trump to succeed him as President under any circumstances. (So watch for Obama to issue a lot of pardons if Trump is elected).

Democrats on the House committee tried to deflect from Clinton's illegal email server during the hearing by asking questions about Donald Trump, Russian hackers, gun control and many other subjects --- all EXCEPT Clinton's violations of the law and the risking of national security. The Democrats claimed the hearing was partisan, when in fact it's not JUST the Republicans, but it's also most Independents who are also concerned about Clinton's email server --- and they also believe she has been dishonest. Hill-bots don't want the truth, because they can't handle the truth.

After some House Committee members made certain allegations, FBI Director James Comey was invited to respond to them if he wished to, but he had declined on several occasions. Also, sometimes he had Hillary Clinton's problem of not being able to remember things. How convenient.

After watching this hearing, I became even more convinced of just how corrupt the Democratic party (our current government) really is, and despite my strong opposition to many GOP policies, the Democrats must not be rewarded for the way they have treated the American people. It is THEY who are the "deplorables" and who are "irredeemable". Clinton was the pot calling the kettle black. Now I can't believe anything Obama or any of them say anymore.

I will vote for Trump to punish Crooked Hillary and the Democrats for the next 4 years, and then see if they can purge some of the corruption from within their cancer-ridden party (I doubt it though). But if not, I will vote for President Trump for another 4 years.

This is House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte's (R-Va.) statement prior to the hearing: "Many members of the House Judiciary Committee continue to have unanswered questions about the FBI’s investigation, Director Comey’s public statements on the matter, and the Justice Department’s decision to not prosecute Secretary Clinton for mishandling classified information through private email servers. It defies logic and the law that she faces no consequences for jeopardizing national security. It also appears that Secretary Clinton may have perjured herself and made false statements to Congress under oath. I’ve called on the Justice Department to investigate her for perjury and am interested to hear from Director Comey on the matter.”

Update: Related Links

  1. Congressman Issa says FBI gave broader immunity to Clinton aides than first disclosed (read UPDATE) - LawNewz
  2. Comey: Cheryl Mills' laptop contained 'some' classified information - Fox News
  3. Comey: Unusual but not unprecedented for Clinton to bring nine lawyers, including Cheryll Mills, to FBI interview - Washington Examiner
  4. Clinton aide Cheryll MIlls asked Pagliano for information on 'wiping' servers, and not with a cloth - Hot Air
  5. Comey denies Clinton email 'Reddit' cover-up, says the computer aide Combetta was trying to replace Clinton's email address so it wouldn't be revealed to the public - POLITICO
  6. Comey silent on pending Clinton perjury probe - TheHill
  7. ARCHIVE: FBI Director James Comey's Clinton Foundation connection - Breibart
  8. ARCHIVE: Comey has long history of cases ending favorable to Clintons - WND
  9. ARCHIVE: James Comey And KPMG: Isn't it ironic - Forbes
  10. FBI doc dump on email case reveals role of 'confidential' Clinton aide - Fox News
  11. Huma Abedin caught in falsehood—but no followup - Breibart
  12. Hillary failed to take highest security training at State Dept in 2009 - The Daily Caller
  13. Fewer than one in five State Dept employees with security clearance completed classified info training - Fox News
  14. VIDEO: Issa grills Comey: Why did Cheryl Mills receive immunity for 'destruction of materials' as well for laptop? - RealClearPolitics
  15. VIDEO (Starts at 3:43:45) : Issa: Mills received immunity under 18 U.S.C. § 2071, which covers concealment, removal or mutilation of government documents - C-SPAN
  16. VIDEO: Gohmert grills Comey: You gave immunity to people who could have made your case - RealClearPolitics
  17. VIDEO: Gowdy to Comey: You have five immunity agreements and no prosecution, 'That's not the FBI that I used to work for' - RealClearPolitics
  18. Gowdy: Mills walked out of FBI interview when they ‘went into an area she didn't want it to go’ (VIDEO) - Breitbart
  19. VIDEO: FBI Director Comey: Clinton IT contractor Combetta's Reddit posts are not evidence of a 'cover-up,' not a violation of immunity deal - RealClearPolitics
  20. VIDEO: Chaffetz grills FBI's Comey: Did Combetta destroy federal records on his own or under instruction? - YouTube

H.A. Goodman: FBI James Comey Tells Congress Clinton Didn't Intend To Use Private Email Server (Also see the links in his video description)

Politico: Comey on Clinton email probe: "Don't call us weasels" (He sure sounded like a weasel at that last hearing!)

* Technical note: I posted this video at Daily Motion rather than YouTube because I didn't verify my YouTube account with a phone number, so I'm limited to 15-minute clips.

#HillaryClinton #FBI #JamesComey #HouseJudiciaryCommittee #Obama emailgate #Democrats #GOP #DishonestDems #JasonChaffetz #Weasels

Sunday, September 25, 2016

Trump could surprise us all, and be a great President

Winning is Trump's greatest inner-driving force. He would want to be the most successful president ever — and to prove all the naynayers and critics wrong.

Clinton and Trump

I might not be able to believe a single thing Donald Trump has to say, but I like what he says and the way he says it --- I like his "message". Hillary Clinton's message comes across too much as "me, me, me" — and not about "us" as a united country. Clinton isn't inspirational like Bernie Sanders or Donald Trump. She doesn't generate enthusiasm; and she sounds selfish, out-of-touch and politically expedient. And then there was that remark she made about half of Trump's supporters being "deplorable" and "unredeemable". Clinton also plays the "race card" a lot, which greatly offends me.

And even if I can't believe Trump, or if I can only believe half of what he says, I especially like what Trump has to say about trade and corruption in government. And I don't believe that his immigration policy is the least bit "racist" at all. (Here's my own thoughts on immigration.) Sure, Trump could be a huckster trying to sell us snake oil, and he could be deliberately adopting many talking points that Bernie Sanders used during his campaign to gain votes — but aren't almost all "establishment" politicians hucksters?

The people want change, so many took a chance to vote for "democratic socialism". But since the Democratic primary was rigged to install another establishment Democrat, many people will take a chance and vote for a billionaire real estate tycoon. The key word here is "change" (not like Obama's false campaign slogan of "Hope and Change", but real change) — and despite Bill Clinton's phony and ridiculous claim, Hillary is NOT the best changer-maker he has ever known.

But to be very clear: I don't agree with Trump on many of the core issues of the Republican party, such as his tax plan, which is just more "feed the rich, starve the poor" GOP economics — also known as "Staving the Beast" and "Trickle-Down Economics". But who knows, maybe Trump could be publicly saying some things just to keep his core base, while feeling completely different about some of these issues privately. But he still sounds much more genuine than any Clinton does (less of a big bullshitter), leaving me the a choice of choosing between the lesser of two husksters.

I regularly watch Trump's entire rallies online, and not just to selected sound bites that the media uses to disparage Trump in their corrupt reporting. I don't trust the media because the BIG 6 corporate media has their own political and economic agenda — and it is very different that ours. If I only watched CNN and MSNBC (or The Apprentice), I'd have a completely different opinion of Donald Trump than I currently do. The "mainstream" media is mostly trying to dig up dirt on Trump and report the most negative aspects of his (sometimes very distant) past ; whereas most of Clinton's dirt is still very fresh and much more damaging to the country as a whole (see all the links at the bottom of this post for examples).

Trump may have participated in shady business dealings; paid off private debts with funds from his charity; had his name on a university that scammed people; outsourced the manufacturing of his ties to China; avoided paying federal incomes taxes; and bribed government officials with campaign contributions ... and he might be a boisterous, self-centered, egotistical and greedy billionaire ... but one can argue that 1) as a businessman, he never worked as a corrupt elected government leader falsely representing The People, 2) and that many of his questionable or unethical dealings were legally performed under the corrupt government system we currently have, 3) and that if there was any level of actual "corruption" on Trump's part, it never came close to rising to the level of corruption the Clintons have engaged in — even if one argued that Trump lies as much as the Clintons do (because Trump tells lies for different and far less nefarious reasons).

And let's face it. After all the lies the Democrats have been caught in lately regarding Hillary Clinton, her email server, the Clinton Foundation, the DNC leaks, the primary election and Bernie Sanders, I can't believe a single damn thing any Democrat says anymore. Obama has been lying to us and hiding things from us for over 7 years after he had promised that his administration would be the most transparent in history. But it has been the exact opposite, and instead, was the most secretive. If Donald Trump had shot someone on 5th Avenue, and a slimy Democrat had told me, I wouldn't believe them. But even if that were true, that still equates to far less dead people than Clinton has gotten killed.

Why I think Trump could be a great President and surprise everyone...

When Obama was first elected in 2008, as a politician, he had very little experience — but with a teleprompter, was a great orator. But he was a great disappointment too, by running as a "progressive" Democrat who ended up being just another "moderate" pro-corporate shill. He either misrepresented himself to the American people (he lied), or "he evolved" in his political beliefs and ideology like Hillary Clinton supposedly has, going from a "moderate" to "progressive". But any sensible person knows that's not true either, and that Hillary Clinton will say anything to get elected.

As a politician, Clinton has a lot of experience (if you count "bad" experience, like Libya) — but she is also a crappy orator who comes across as very fake and contrived (a big bullshiter), who even lies about lying. On the other hand, Trump was never a politician; he spent his time around construction workers — so excuse him if he comes across as a little rough around the edges and is politically "incorrect". But aren't most of us? And yes, he lies too ... but as I said, for far less nefarious reasons than I believe Clinton does.

If one wanted to believe the worse about Donald Trump, he might have been a greedy and selfish man his entire life; but at 70 years old, he may want to go out making amends — and to make his children and grandchildren as proud of him as they can possibly be (even more so than they already are.) And I think his kids will keep him on the straight and narrow (more so than a Democratic or Republican Congress ever could.)

As Trump was growing his financial empire, he might not have treated his workers and other people fairly — and he might have engaged in the sort of corrupt pay-for-play that we've come to know with our government leaders. But it's still possible that Trump can be a great president if he wore a different hat (as president, not as a businessman) — and for 2 reasons: His ego and his rejection of failure.

Ego: In 2011 Trump was accused for helping to start the birther moment against Obama — so Obama might have wanted his revenge*. Soon afterwards I posted a blog article ridiculing Trump for this, believing Obama was born to an American citizen and was born in the State of Hawaii two years after it became a State. But recently an IT guy named Michael Trimm (who was a Bernie Sanders supporter) downloaded Obama's birth certificate from the White House website and did a forensic analysis examination on it with a special Adobe program — and he makes a very compelling case that it is, in fact, a sloppy forgery. Trimm takes you step by step through his entire process. The only thing he can't tell us is what the document originally showed before it was altered.

* From Obama's speech at the White House Correspondents Dinner on May 1, 2011. NOTE: Osama bin Laden was killed the very next day on May 2, 2011, shortly after 4:00 pm EST. Then Obama went on TV to make the announcement. (The night before, while Obama was berating Trump, he had known the raid on Osama bin Laden was already in the works.)

"There’s a vicious rumor floating around that I think could really hurt Mitt Romney. I heard he passed universal health care when he was governor of Massachusetts. Someone should get to the bottom of that. And I know just the guy to do it -– Donald Trump is here tonight! (Laughter and applause.)

Now, I know that he’s taken some flak lately, but no one is happier, no one is prouder to put this birth certificate matter to rest than the Donald. (Laughter.) And that’s because he can finally get back to focusing on the issues that matter –- like, did we fake the moon landing? (Laughter.) What really happened in Roswell? (Laughter.) And where are Biggie and Tupac? (Laughter and applause.)

But all kidding aside, obviously, we all know about your credentials and breadth of experience. (Laughter.) For example -- no, seriously, just recently, in an episode of Celebrity Apprentice -- at the steakhouse, the men’s cooking team cooking did not impress the judges from Omaha Steaks. And there was a lot of blame to go around. But you, Mr. Trump, recognized that the real problem was a lack of leadership. And so ultimately, you didn’t blame Lil’ Jon or Meatloaf. (Laughter.) You fired Gary Busey. (Laughter.) And these are the kind of decisions that would keep me up at night. Well handled, sir. Well handled. (Laughter and applause.)

Say what you will about Mr. Trump, he certainly would bring some change to the White House. Let’s see what we’ve got up there. (Screens show “Trump White House Resort and Casino.”) So, yes, this has been quite a year in politics..." (See the video here.)

After he MIGHT have been publicly humiliated by Obama at the White House Correspondence Dinner in front of millions of people, Trump might also want to exact some revenge by proving that he's a bigger and better man than Obama by thoroughly disproving all the ugly things Obama has said about him — because they say success is the best revenge — and Trump will not only want to just become the next President (being Obama's successor), but also to be much more successful at the job ... better than Obama.

But it should also be noted that, in actuality, Trump MIGHT not have really been humiliated by Obama's remarks at all. If anything, he was little displeased with Seth Meyers' remarks afterwards; because as the Washington Post wrote:

This narrative flies in the face of actual history: Trump mentioned running for president as far back as the 1980s, so the notion that this dinner was the single catalyst for this presidential campaign is absurd. He frequently used humor as part of his self-promotional tool kit and was the guest of honor at a 2011 Comedy Central roast just two months before the correspondents’ dinner — an X-rated drubbing that made Obama and Meyers look like weenies. Trump had said, “There are many reasons I’m running. But that's not one of them.”

Failure: After being on the campaign trail, and getting millions of votes, and after seeing the thousands and thousands of ordinary working people heaping so much enthusiastic support upon him at his HUGE rallies, Trump might have realized the enormous responsibility he would have as President, and he wouldn't want to let all those people down — and again, to prove to Obama and the rest of the country that he can do a much better job than Obama. Trump likes winning. Like I said: Trump will not only want to become President, but to be very successful at the job. Trump despises failure. Unlike Obama, he may not make up lame excuses to cover up for inept people in his administration — he will fire them.

Also, Trump is already a billionaire, so special interests and lobbyists wouldn't have as much influence on him as other establishment politicians. He would most likely just like to succeed where Obama has failed, giving him a more righteous place in history (and maybe to have a swanky TRUMP presidential library to leave behind as his legacy.)

It should also be noted that most of the corporate media is in the bag for Clinton (and contributed to her campaign); but if Trump is elected, they will watch his every move and will constantly hold his feet to the fire. Whereas with Clinton, just like now, she may get a lot more free passes. There will be very little government "transparency" with Clinton in the White House (It's already bad enough with Obama.)

And Trump doesn't strike me as being a typical Republican ("alt" or otherwise) — nor as a slimy Democrat who'd rig elections. He's something else entirely — and why establishment politicians on both the sides of the aisle reject him (many GOPers are backing Clinton). Although, Trump's not Bernie Sanders either. Bernie was one of a kind. But Trump may also be a "once in a lifetime" candidate too and may not be as evil as Bernie believes. Since he endorsed Clinton, I really have a hard time believing anything Bernie Sanders now says.

Of course, I could be completely wrong about everything (delusional) ... and Trump could screw us all. But I hope not, because after 30 years, Clinton has done crappola for us. She's been a part of the problem all along, so I can't see her as being part of the solution now. I think she just wants to prove to her husband (and herself) that she's just as good as he is, and that being a woman is the only qualification she needs to break the glass ceiling of her glass house.

But if for any reason at all, I'd just like to see egg all over the faces of Clinton's smug and pompous surrogates (and all the media elites) and all those who screwed over Bernie Sanders. Their lies and deceit shouldn't be rewarded, even if it turns out that Clinton IS the lesser of two evils — which I doubt, because I don't think Trump ever got anyone killed.

And finally, in the end, most people want REAL change ... so for me, if it can't be Bernie, maybe it can be Trump. But NEVER Clinton.

And also, let's be honest, neither Jill nor Gary will be the next President in 2016 — so it's a waste of time and a vote to vote for either. A vote for either would be a vote for Trump or Clinton, so you might as well make a choice for the "Lesser of two evils" and vote for one of them. And IMHO, I think Clinton is much more evil. And I think she is more racist than Trump; and to the best of my knowledge, many more people were killed in Iraq and Libya than there were at Trump University.

But as I said, I could be all wrong about everything I wrote here (delusional); but even so, I think we can survive 4 years with a President Trump ... and I don't believe he can unilaterally push some red button and start a nuclear war/World War III and destroy the human race. I think that is mostly a lot of fear-mongering by "establishment" politicians who like the status quo just as it is and don't want to see any real changes at all.

President Trump

FYI: Below are just 41 recent links to headlines and stories showing why the Clintons are too damn corrupt to be occupying the White House again — and this just mostly pertains to their foundation, and excludes the previous 25 years of corruption and the many other controversies that have surrounded them during their entire political careers.

  1. Networks ignore Clinton Foundation conflict of interest in 95% of stories -

  2. Clinton gave State Department appointments to 194 donors, nearly 40 percent of the 511 advisory appointments - Washington Examiner

  3. Bill Clinton’s speaking fee overlaps with Foundation business, paid by industry that later benefited from family charity’s Haitian project - WSJ

  4. Exclusive: Clinton charities ignore law requiring them to disclose millions from foreign donors - ABC Newsnet5

  5. Bill Clinton falsely claims Foundation discloses all info on donors, activities -

  6. Clinton Foundation deceived IRS on tax exemption - The Daily Caller

  7. The problem with the Clinton Foundation's tax status - The Daily Caller

  8. The 21 pages deleted from The Clinton Foundation's 2005 IRS tax-exempt annual return - Michael Smith News

  9. Opinions: Clinton Foundation taxes deserve close scrutiny - Belleville News-Democrat

  10. "Clinton Foundation is charity fraud of epic proportions", analyst Charles Ortel charges in stunning takedown - Zero Hedge

  11. The Clinton Foundation's problems are deeper than you think - Current Affairs

  12. Report: Clinton Foundation gave ‘watered-down' AIDS drugs to Third World countries - The Daily Caller

  13. Press release: Congressman Marsha Blackburn releases Clinton Foundation report -

  14. REPORT: The Clinton Foundation and the ‘India success story': Self-serving philanthropy, watered-down drugs, and money in sub-Saharan Africa -

  15. ARCHIVE: Although The FDA sent a public “warning letter” to Ranbaxy in 2006, Bill Clinton praised the company for fight against AIDS - The Economic Times

  16. ARCHIVE: Ranbaxy pleads guilty and agrees to pay $500 Million to resolve false claims allegations, violations and false statements to the FDA - Department of Justice

  17. New documents that reveal Bill Clinton's backdated contracts and multimillion $$$$ frauds in the name of HIV/Aids - Michael Smith News

  18. Clinton's "bottom of the harbour" AIDS business - Michael Smith News

  19. Bill Clinton's early days in tax-exempt business - and his original sin in The Bahamas tax haven - Michael Smith News

  20. The CHAI Lie and the HIV/AIDS treatment: What connects Haiti with Papua New Guinea – Medium

  21. Bill Clinton says it was only ‘natural’ for Clinton Foundation donors to ask State Department for favors - The Daily Caller

  22. More Clinton Shenanigans in Haiti, Emails show the State Department and the Clinton Foundation collaborated on policy - WSJ

  23. Ex-Haitian President of Senate says Clinton Foundation withheld billions of donations, calls to 'disclose the audit of all the money' - Daily Caller

  24. VIDEO: Speech of the former Haitian President of Senate - YouTube

  25. Millions from Clinton Foundation donors bought seats to WH dinners, those who authorized the special invitations were ensconced in the Department of State’s Office of Protocol - The Daily Caller

  26. Emails detail State Dept. effort under Clinton to aid Foundation donor Walmart - Washington Examiner

  27. Clinton charity partner slams ‘philanthropic abuse’ -

  28. Clinton Foundation donor kicked out of China’s National People’s Congress on accusations of bribing his way into office - The Daily Caller

  29. Bill Clinton’s birthday bash proves the Clintons just can’t stop influence-peddling - New York Post

  30. POLL (Gallup): Hillary is 'email,' 'lie,' 'foundation,' 'scandal,' 'pneumonia' - Washington Examiner

  31. Paul Combetta, who deleted Hillary Clinton emails, may have asked Reddit for tips on how to remove a 'VERY VIP' email address - US News

  32. House panel looking into Paul Combetta’s Reddit post about Clinton's email server - TheHill

  33. Platte River executives fretted about being ordered to purge Clinton emails believing it was a cover up - New York Post

  34. Text of the exchange on Reddit involving Paul Combetta: Remove or replace to/from address on archived emails? - exchangeserver

  35. VIDEO: Hillary’s bleachbit specialist Paul Combetta deleting all of his reddit posts on video - Erik Jones on Twitter^tfw

  36. ARCHIVE: Tech firm charged Clinton $250 an hour for Paul Combetta’s interviews with Feds - Fox Nation

  37. Senator Grassley: FBI withholding key information about Clinton's deleted emails - PJ Media

  38. Judge blasts State Dept. for slow-walking Hillary Clinton emails - Washington Times

  39. State Department delays records request about Clinton-linked firm until after the 2016 election, the latest in a string of similar postponements - IBTimes

  40. Judicial Watch: New State Department documents reveal top agency officials raised questions about Clinton emails in early August 2013 - Judicial Watch

  41. Sen. seeks formal damage assessment of Clinton email secrets loss -


  1. Clinton campaign defends immunity deal for aide Mills, others in FBI email probe
  2. Clinton Camp's Benenson: Immunity Deals Given To Clinton Staffers Are "Fairly Appropriate And Routine"
  3. House GOP rep: FBI immunity deals for Clinton aides ‘strangest stuff I’ve ever seen’
  4. Jason Chaffetz on the FBI: "No wonder they couldn’t prosecute a case. They were handing out immunity deals like candy” -
  5. Republicans incensed that the FBI immunity deals did not require witnesses to cooperate with Congress - POLITICO
  6. Legal analysis: Why did the Obama Justice Department grant Cheryl Mills immunity? There was no need to grant concessions - National Review
  7. History of Cheryl Mills as Hillary’s aide obstructing investigations, Why did the feds give a key suspect who orchestrated the destruction of government records immunity as a witness? - New York Post
  8. Cheryl Mills immunity bombshell: She avoided signing mandatory security forms - Breitbart
  9. Insiders: FBI used agents as pawns to insulate Hillary, aides & Clinton Foundation from prosecutions - True Pundit
  10. Former NSA analyst and counterintelligence officer Schindler op-ed: The FBI investigation of emailgate was a sham - Observer
  11. VIDEO: Rudy Giuliani: It is disgraceful. To give immunity to so many people... The violations here were so many, so often, so gross - RealClearPolitics
  12. Clinton campaign manager has no answer when asked about an email in which the Clinton IT contractor referred to the 60-day email retention policy as “Hillary cover-up" (VIDEO) - Daily Caller
  13. Clinton aide told FBI there were internal concerns raised at State over private email server - The Washington Post
  14. Obama used a pseudonym in emails with Clinton, FBI documents reveal - POLITICO
  15. 27 things we learned from Clinton's FBI files - Washington Examiner
  16. Text of the FBI interview notes from Hillary Clinton e-mail investigation for mishandling of classified information - Public Intelligence
  17. ARCHIVE: EmailGate and the mystery of the missing GAMMA, Clinton’s 'unclassified' email included highly classified NSA information—why didn’t the FBI mention this fact? - Observer
  18. Ruling means most of Hillary Clinton’s newly uncovered 2,800 work-related emails will come out after election - The New York Times
  19. The public deserves to know what is in those emails, well before November 8. It is outrageous the State Dept has had these emails since late July, but has only released 5 records - Judicial Watch
  20. The State Department has said that Clinton did not include any of her emails with Petraeus when her lawyers screened and returned what they said were all her work emails in 2014 - Reuters

Thursday, September 22, 2016

I used to believe Bernie Sanders, not now.

Did Bernie Sanders endorse the lesser of two evils, or did he endorse the enemy?

Bernie Sanders endorses Hillary Clinton

Everything Bernie currently says (after he endorsed Hillary Clinton), should be taken with a grain of salt. It was Bernie himself who said we should not listen to him as to who to vote for; and he said it would be up to Hillary to make her case to the voters.

What he is NOW saying on Clinton's behalf is not consistent with his past statements. Who knows why ... maybe his grandchildren were threatened. In 1992 the Independent Ross Perot withdrew his 3rd party candidacy because he feared Republican "dirty tricks" threatening his daughter.

Or perhaps Bernie has a very genuine (but obsessive) fear of Trump, and he really does believe Trump is as dangerous as Hitler.

Previously, while he was still running, Bernie Sanders told his supporters not to listen to him if he ever told us who to vote for. On April 25, 2016 Bernie Sanders told us — like he did MANY times before — that he can't tell us who to vote for, and then he added, "If I ever do, you shouldn't listen to me."

Furthermore, in 1991 Bernie said we definitely need a 3rd party, such as a Rainbow Coalition party outside the Democratic party. But he lost that vision and never pursued or helped create a viable 3rd party. Instead he endorsed and campaigned for the status quo.

Also, many of us believe that Clinton is more dangerous than Trump. Actress Susan Sarandon made a good case against Hillary Clinton, who used to be her friend at one time.

The Bush family supports Clinton for the 2016 presidency. Despite occasional public rhetoric, they have a very close relationship and they see their families (Bush/Clinton) as one family. So what does this mean? It means Clinton has served the oligarchs her whole life. That's why so many "establishment" Republicans and "establishment" Democrats are currently supporting Hillary Clinton — to keep the political duopoly in power.

And finally, NJ.Com does not appear to be a left-wing/liberal or pro-Trump/alt-right online news publication. In 2016, its editors called on acting governor Chris Christie to resign from office, after a failed presidential campaign and Christie's endorsement of Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. So this poll surprised me >

JIll Stein leads in the polls.

And remember, the corporate media (The Big 6 media conglomerates) controls 90% of the media, so what they mostly report is in THEIR best interests, not yours. Cable news channels like Fox News, CNN and MSNBC have their own political agendas, so do your own independent research to verify or debunk everything they report that concerns you — and then come to your own independent consensus as to where the truth lies.

In closing, watch this VERY interesting 15-minute video about the last Democratic convention - - - rigged and fake and full of lies.